<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantifying the digg Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web2.0-blog.com/2007/02/28/quantifying-the-digg-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web2.0-blog.com/2007/02/28/quantifying-the-digg-effect/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:42:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The digg effect and unreliable hosts -- Oak Innovations Blog</title>
		<link>http://web2.0-blog.com/2007/02/28/quantifying-the-digg-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>The digg effect and unreliable hosts -- Oak Innovations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web2.0-blog.com/?p=103#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out this post over at the Web 2.0 Blog to see how many sites actually go down under the digg effect on any given [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out this post over at the Web 2.0 Blog to see how many sites actually go down under the digg effect on any given [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.807 seconds -->
